Title Now I behold thy lovely body. Version 8. Created in Photoshop CS. Best viewed at any resolution, any browser. In use since March 18, 2010. The brushes are my own. The textures are my own. The stocks are from here, here, and my own collection.
copyright
Everything on this site, except resources listed here, is property of Sabryna at Disjecta-Membra.net. If you use my resources, you must credit Disjecta-Membra. No one likes a thief.
This is my webhost. Surprise!
MY EYES. What on earth were you thinking putting hotpink on medium grey! I can barely read the text.
Nice to see I'm not in the "being reviewed by" box. I do love it when sites list other reviewers but not me.
Navigation
I can barely read it. It is white small fonts [size 5 pt, it looks] on hot pink. It's putting major strain on my eyes.
That being said and heavily emphasized, the navigation links are in an odd order. First Portfolio, then packages, request, hosting, reviews,
more, site, and finally home. I would rename more to "visitor" or "content."
Aside from the aforementioned, the site is easy to navugate.
Header
My eyes. They burn. I'm going to consider the whole table the header. The site's name is easily read. Hotpink on dark grey doesn't
burn the eyes. Oddly, this is the same color scheme as the last time I reviewed her, and I do believe I mentioned hotpink is
hard on the eyes of visitors. The header is pretty boring, even for a simple layout.
Coding
!!! <--- How I feel about the coding. Different font effects are used, but it's all the same font and it's all hot pink on medium grey!
Honestly, my eyes can't handle the strain of trying to read your site. Please, change the default text to dark grey (the color of the links).
Pink headers is fine, but that default font needs to be changed. And maybe use different fonts for the headers or links to make the coding more
interesting.
Content
"More"
Pre Mades Premades is one word. There is one of Robert Pattinson. The image header really isn't too bad. It has nice textures,
interesting blending, and a good use of text. The coding, however, isn't too good. Same font used for everything and the dull-on-dull colors
aren't very appealing. The main text is a bit hard to read. Also, this should open in a new window.
Icons and Signatures I'm feeling abit lazy to go through each sub category so here they are: A Walk to Remember, Disney,
Kristen Stewart, Robin and Patrick [?], Starr and Cole [?], and Twilight. These are very well made and use textures and colorizing
very well. Why didn't you make your layout like you make your graphics?
PSD's There is no need for the apostrophe. There is not a huge selection of these, but they appear to be cut well and
high-quality images were used.
Signs Same comments as last time I reviewed: nice images, but I think people should make their own signs.
Textures Nice to see the water textures are still there. These are all nice. Is teh texture set at the bottom all of the
textures above, or is it just a random set? And I meant to point this out earlier, but I'll do it now: Blue borders around images are tacky and unappealing. Put
border="0" in your image tags to get rid of it.
Brushes I like the swrily brushes, but not the fire-work looking ones. I think they were made with crayon.
Scans Same comments as last time (sad that this section hasn't been updated).
Color Themes The first does nto load, but the other color schemes are very nice. I don't know why one of these couldn't
be used for the current layout.
Summary
Not much has changed since I last reviewed this site, it still burns the eyes and the content is the same. There are some really nice avatars
and banners you might want to check out if you like the subjects, but if not I wouldn't visit.
Suggestions
Don't burn your visitor's eyes; please, use mellower colors or colors that contrast more.
Take off the borders around your image links.
Make your coding more interesting by using different fonts and effects.
Make your site layouts the way you make your banners, which are really nice.
