Title Now I behold thy lovely body. Version 8. Created in Photoshop CS. Best viewed at any resolution, any browser. In use since March 18, 2010. The brushes are my own. The textures are my own. The stocks are from here, here, and my own collection.
copyright
Everything on this site, except resources listed here, is property of Sabryna at Disjecta-Membra.net. If you use my resources, you must credit Disjecta-Membra. No one likes a thief.
This is my webhost. Surprise!
I like the image of the layout! It's very unique, and I like the vintage feel.
However, the background image is awful. It repeats badly and half of it is sharp, half is blurry. I don't like how the nav links go from size 20 to size 8 when you hover over them.
Navigation
The navigation links are quite large and off to the site of the image. However, when you click a link, the pages have no navigation links, just a small "back" link underneath the image header.
Header
The header is nice; I must say, it does grab the attention. Of course on closer inspection one notices how pixely it is, and how some parts are blurry. The site's name can be seen on the header, as well as the definition of "chirocracy."
Coding
When looking at the coding, I notice there are no html, head, OR body tags, and instead of style type="text/css", it just says style. I would suggest fixing this.
The coding appearance of this site is a bit odd. The content is in a grey table that doesn't match any grey in the image. The colors in the coding don't match the header at all. I'm not sure what she was thinking when she coded this.
Content
Layouts
There are four layouts in this section. The images are all really bad quality. They are grainy, pixely, and blurry. The coding is also pretty boring and similar, and in some cases doesn't match the header.
Portfolio - [ Stock Photography ]
These are pretty nice, but most are grainy. I can see some of these being useful.
Resources
Brushes I can't see anyone using these, though people tend to use anything. The thing I do not like about these is that the edges are pixelated, and the flower brushes have straight edges.
Scans These are pretty nice. Most are album scans. Some are kind of grainy.
Summary
This site is a nice start. I love the originality of the layout image, and there is a nice collection of scans. However, I'd wait until there is a bit more high quality content on the site before paying a visit.
Sugesstions
I'm not sure why your layout images are so grainy/blurry. Save them at a high quality?
