Title Now I behold thy lovely body. Version 8. Created in Photoshop CS. Best viewed at any resolution, any browser. In use since March 18, 2010. The brushes are my own. The textures are my own. The stocks are from here, here, and my own collection.
copyright
Everything on this site, except resources listed here, is property of Sabryna at Disjecta-Membra.net. If you use my resources, you must credit Disjecta-Membra. No one likes a thief.
This is my webhost. Surprise!
Nice colors! I love the vibrant pink of the image. It's colored very well. And... and, can it be? A music player that doesn't start automatically?
Fantastic! I hope the content is as good as I hope it is.
Navigation
Another site with a Navigation at the top and in the sidebar. Really, you just need one. Persaonnly, I'd go with the drop down menus: they're easier to
navigate with. That being said, the site is easy to navigate.
Header
I love it! It's a bit small for my liking, but the coloring job on the flowers is fantastic! It's not too blinding and the colors are very pretty.
But, oh noes! The site name isn't on the header! Personally, I think it's bery important to have your site's name on the header image.
Coding
The coding is well done. It uses different fonts and text decorations and uses colors found in the image header. I must say though, link hovers should be a different color than the link.
Maybe it's just me, but I like to see it change colors.
When looking at the coding, I get a sense that it's made up of bits of stolen code from other places. The way the coding is typed changes format like four times, which
means it has been cut-and-pasted from various sites. Hopefully from tutorials.
Content
Banners There are two, and I can't say I am impressed. These must be some of their older work. The images are pixely and oddly edited; all that has been added is text. Also, these should
open up in a new window.
Blends There are quite a few more of these. These too are not very good. The first few are very grainy/blurry images and it's obvious that textures and brushes are not utilized.
Some of them are blended well, but the text applied to them distracts from the good blending. [In all honesty, the blends by Sakura are not equal to the quality of her sitemate Felicity.]
Site Layouts First: all but one of these is blurry and/or pixelly. Two: they are indeed coded, but there's no preview of the coding! Just of the image. I can't see anyone using these layouts.
This section needs to be redone with graphics that equal the quality of the site layout.
Simple CSS A live preview would be so much better for these than the small blurry preivew images currently in place. The CSS is not valid CSS, and it should be run through a vailadator. It's unprofessional to give
out "incorrect" coding.
Icons There are 10 available and I only like two of them. Five of them are either blurry or pixely, and the two I do like could be a lot more interesting. Only two of these appear to have textures.
I'm starting to wonder if either of the girls made the image in the layout because the content on their site isn't nearly as nice looking.
Wallpapers I do like that they have two different sizes, but I don't like the appearance of any of them. They are also either blurry or pixely, the larger ones horribly so. I don't see
anyone using these when there are high quality, sharp wallpapers elsewhere.
Summary
I must say I was rather disappointed with this site. Judging by the site layout I thought there would be some really nice, sharp, well-colored images in their content, but there wasn't.
It definitely needs to improve the quality of its content before I'd recommend it to anyone.
Suggestions
Use images that are sharp and high-quality.
Make use of brushes and textures, and try to blend the text into the images when you use it.
Make blends, banners, etc. open in a new window.
Create LIVE previews for your layouts and your CSS.
